Ruth Marcus, Washington Post
I've always thought of the Supreme Court as having a kind of internal, institutional gyroscope that keeps it from veering too far out of kilter.This notional instrumentation is obviously imperfect; there are times when the court overreaches. And in recent years "” call it the post-Bush v. Gore era "” there have been numerous instances that give cause to wonder whether the gyroscope is functioning at all.
No comments:
Post a Comment